Daniel De Moulin

About

Daniel De Moulin is a scholar working on History, Anthropology and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel De Moulin has authored 3 papers receiving a total of 39 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 1 paper in History, 1 paper in Anthropology and 0 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Recurrent topics in Daniel De Moulin’s work include Historical and Literary Studies (1 paper) and History of Medicine Studies (1 paper). Daniel De Moulin is often cited by papers focused on Historical and Literary Studies (1 paper) and History of Medicine Studies (1 paper). Daniel De Moulin collaborates with scholars based in and . Daniel De Moulin's co-authors include and and has published in prestigious journals such as Annals of Internal Medicine and PubMed.

In The Last Decade

No nodes

Daniel De Moulin

3 papers receiving 33 citations

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel De Moulin

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel De Moulin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel De Moulin. The network helps show where Daniel De Moulin may publish in the future.

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel De Moulin

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel De Moulin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel De Moulin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel De Moulin more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact