G. Merna McKenzie
About
In The Last Decade
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. Merna McKenzie
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. Merna McKenzie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. Merna McKenzie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. Merna McKenzie. G. Merna McKenzie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
G. Merna McKenzie
11 papers receiving 238 citations
Fields of papers citing papers by G. Merna McKenzie
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Merna McKenzie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Merna McKenzie. The network helps show where G. Merna McKenzie may publish in the future.
Countries citing papers authored by G. Merna McKenzie
This map shows the geographic impact of G. Merna McKenzie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Merna McKenzie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Merna McKenzie more than expected).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.