Kazım Barış Atici
About
In The Last Decade
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kazım Barış Atici
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kazım Barış Atici. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kazım Barış Atici based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kazım Barış Atici. Kazım Barış Atici is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kazım Barış Atici
22 papers receiving 462 citations
Fields of papers citing papers by Kazım Barış Atici
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kazım Barış Atici. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kazım Barış Atici. The network helps show where Kazım Barış Atici may publish in the future.
Countries citing papers authored by Kazım Barış Atici
This map shows the geographic impact of Kazım Barış Atici's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kazım Barış Atici with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kazım Barış Atici more than expected).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.