Michael Daneshvar
About
In The Last Decade
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Daneshvar
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Daneshvar. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Daneshvar based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Daneshvar. Michael Daneshvar is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Michael Daneshvar
30 papers receiving 214 citations
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Daneshvar
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Daneshvar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Daneshvar. The network helps show where Michael Daneshvar may publish in the future.
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Daneshvar
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Daneshvar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Daneshvar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Daneshvar more than expected).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.