Pratik Devasthale
About
In The Last Decade
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pratik Devasthale
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pratik Devasthale. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pratik Devasthale based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pratik Devasthale. Pratik Devasthale is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Pratik Devasthale
12 papers receiving 147 citations
Fields of papers citing papers by Pratik Devasthale
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pratik Devasthale. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pratik Devasthale. The network helps show where Pratik Devasthale may publish in the future.
Countries citing papers authored by Pratik Devasthale
This map shows the geographic impact of Pratik Devasthale's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pratik Devasthale with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pratik Devasthale more than expected).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.