Adoption Quarterly

452 papers and 5.5k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 452 papers published in Adoption Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 5.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Adoption Quarterly usually cover Safety Research (399 papers), Demography (153 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (151 papers) specifically the topics of Child Welfare and Adoption (398 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (151 papers) and Reproductive Health and Technologies (144 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Adoption Quarterly are Harold D. Grotevant, David M. Brodzinsky, Amanda L. Baden, Abbie E. Goldberg, Ruth G. McRoy, Elsbeth Neil, Tony Xing Tan, Scott D. Ryan, Mary Dozier and M. Elizabeth Vonk.

In The Last Decade

Adoption Quarterly

399 papers receiving 4.9k citations

Fields of papers published in Adoption Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Adoption Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Adoption Quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in Adoption Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Adoption Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Adoption Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adoption Quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026