Alzheimer s & Dementia

14.4k papers and 174.8k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 14.4k papers published in Alzheimer s & Dementia in the last decades have received a total of 174.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Alzheimer s & Dementia usually cover Psychiatry and Mental health (5.2k papers), Physiology (4.3k papers) and Molecular Biology (2.1k papers) specifically the topics of Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (4.9k papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (3.8k papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (879 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Alzheimer s & Dementia are María C. Carrillo, William Thies, Clifford R. Jack, Creighton H. Phelps, Bill Thies, David S. Knopman, Ronald C. Petersen, John C. Morris, Philip Scheltens and Anders Wimo.

In The Last Decade

Alzheimer s & Dementia

11.2k papers receiving 165.5k citations

Fields of papers published in Alzheimer s & Dementia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Alzheimer s & Dementia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Alzheimer s & Dementia.

Countries where authors publish in Alzheimer s & Dementia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Alzheimer s & Dementia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Alzheimer s & Dementia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alzheimer s & Dementia more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026