Archaeological Journal

873 papers and 3.6k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 873 papers published in Archaeological Journal in the last decades have received a total of 3.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Archaeological Journal usually cover Archeology (287 papers), Paleontology (225 papers) and Anthropology (184 papers) specifically the topics of Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (225 papers), Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies (94 papers) and Archaeological Research and Protection (81 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Archaeological Journal are Simon James, Patrick Faulkner, Martin Millett, Richard Madgwick, Colin Burgess, Richard Hingley, Marijke van der Veen, Craig Cessford, C. K. Thomas and David Blackman.

In The Last Decade

Archaeological Journal

389 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Fields of papers published in Archaeological Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Archaeological Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Archaeological Journal.

Countries where authors publish in Archaeological Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Archaeological Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Archaeological Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Archaeological Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026