Child Care in Practice

781 papers and 6.3k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 781 papers published in Child Care in Practice in the last decades have received a total of 6.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Child Care in Practice usually cover Clinical Psychology (407 papers), Sociology and Political Science (243 papers) and Safety Research (217 papers) specifically the topics of Child Abuse and Trauma (171 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (166 papers) and Family and Disability Support Research (123 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Child Care in Practice are Nicola Atwool, Mike Stein, Babs Anderson, Robert J. Chaskin, Ellen Beate Hansen Sandseter, Mark A. Brennan, Lisa Bunting, Alison Clark, Brian J. Taylor and Martin C. Calder.

In The Last Decade

Child Care in Practice

655 papers receiving 5.2k citations

Fields of papers published in Child Care in Practice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Child Care in Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Child Care in Practice.

Countries where authors publish in Child Care in Practice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Child Care in Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Child Care in Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Child Care in Practice more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026