Contemporary Literature

1.3k papers and 3.2k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Contemporary Literature in the last decades have received a total of 3.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Contemporary Literature usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (641 papers), Sociology and Political Science (215 papers) and Philosophy (123 papers) specifically the topics of Poetry Analysis and Criticism (209 papers), Contemporary Literature and Criticism (161 papers) and American and British Literature Analysis (63 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Contemporary Literature are Terry Eagleton, Toni Morrison, Rebecca L. Walkowitz, Ian Baucom, Nellie Y. McKay, Graham Huggan, Simone Murray, Ashraf H. A. Rushdy, John Marx and Kazuo Ishiguro.

In The Last Decade

Contemporary Literature

480 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Fields of papers published in Contemporary Literature

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Contemporary Literature. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Contemporary Literature.

Countries where authors publish in Contemporary Literature

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Contemporary Literature. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Contemporary Literature with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Contemporary Literature more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026