Global Policy

1.4k papers and 14.3k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 1.4k papers published in Global Policy in the last decades have received a total of 14.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Global Policy usually cover Political Science and International Relations (537 papers), Sociology and Political Science (435 papers) and Development (313 papers) specifically the topics of International Development and Aid (313 papers), International Relations and Foreign Policy (102 papers) and Global Peace and Security Dynamics (95 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Global Policy are Stephen Cooke, Nick Bostrom, Douglas Bulloch, Sakiko Fukuda‐Parr, William Vlcek, Branko Milanović, Robert Wade, Béla Greskovits, Ngaire Woods and Desmond McNeill.

In The Last Decade

Global Policy

1.2k papers receiving 12.5k citations

Fields of papers published in Global Policy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Global Policy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Global Policy.

Countries where authors publish in Global Policy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Global Policy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Global Policy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Global Policy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026