Gynecological Surgery

800 papers and 5.6k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 800 papers published in Gynecological Surgery in the last decades have received a total of 5.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Gynecological Surgery usually cover Obstetrics and Gynecology (446 papers), Surgery (363 papers) and Reproductive Medicine (330 papers) specifically the topics of Uterine Myomas and Treatments (369 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (273 papers) and Gynecological conditions and treatments (232 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Gynecological Surgery are Rudi Campo, Stephan Gordts, Hans A.M. Brölmann, Grigoris Grimbizis, Steven Weyers, Geoffrey Trew, Jan Bosteels, Vasilios Tanos, Carlos Roger Molinas and Ivo Brosens.

In The Last Decade

Gynecological Surgery

719 papers receiving 5.0k citations

Fields of papers published in Gynecological Surgery

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Gynecological Surgery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Gynecological Surgery.

Countries where authors publish in Gynecological Surgery

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Gynecological Surgery. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Gynecological Surgery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gynecological Surgery more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026