Holocaust Studies

337 papers and 669 indexed citations
i
.

About

The 337 papers published in Holocaust Studies in the last decades have received a total of 669 indexed citations. Papers published in Holocaust Studies usually cover Social Psychology (180 papers), Sociology and Political Science (173 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (104 papers) specifically the topics of Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration (177 papers), European history and politics (54 papers) and Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (53 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Holocaust Studies are Sue Vice, Peter Davies, Mykola Makhortykh, Tom Lawson, Claire Griffiths, Adam Brown, Bodo von Borries, Robert Eaglestone, Jelena Subotić and Geoffrey Short.

In The Last Decade

Holocaust Studies

131 papers receiving 432 citations

Fields of papers published in Holocaust Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Holocaust Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Holocaust Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Holocaust Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Holocaust Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Holocaust Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Holocaust Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026