JAAD Case Reports

2.9k papers and 12.2k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 2.9k papers published in JAAD Case Reports in the last decades have received a total of 12.2k indexed citations. Papers published in JAAD Case Reports usually cover Dermatology (1.3k papers), Epidemiology (901 papers) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (712 papers) specifically the topics of Autoimmune Bullous Skin Diseases (458 papers), Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research (352 papers) and Cancer and Skin Lesions (244 papers). The most active scholars publishing in JAAD Case Reports are J. Levitt, William Damsky, Brett King, Jeff Donovan, David James Najarian, Brittany G. Craiglow, Orit Markowitz, Misha Rosenbach, Rodney Sinclair and Matthew D. Vesely.

In The Last Decade

JAAD Case Reports

2.2k papers receiving 11.8k citations

Fields of papers published in JAAD Case Reports

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in JAAD Case Reports. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in JAAD Case Reports.

Countries where authors publish in JAAD Case Reports

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in JAAD Case Reports. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in JAAD Case Reports with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites JAAD Case Reports more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026