Microbial Biotechnology

2.2k papers and 62.7k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 2.2k papers published in Microbial Biotechnology in the last decades have received a total of 62.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Microbial Biotechnology usually cover Molecular Biology (1.2k papers), Biomedical Engineering (352 papers) and Ecology (348 papers) specifically the topics of Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction (349 papers), Biofuel production and bioconversion (209 papers) and Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (186 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Microbial Biotechnology are Harald Brüssow, Ren Wei, Wolfgang Zimmermann, Willy Verstraete, Engy Ahmed, Sara Holmström, Hans‐Georg Sahl, Dina Raafat, Arnold L. Demain and Lawrence P. Wackett.

In The Last Decade

Microbial Biotechnology

2.0k papers receiving 61.3k citations

Fields of papers published in Microbial Biotechnology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Microbial Biotechnology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Microbial Biotechnology.

Countries where authors publish in Microbial Biotechnology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Microbial Biotechnology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Microbial Biotechnology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Microbial Biotechnology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026