Mind Culture and Activity

711 papers and 16.2k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 711 papers published in Mind Culture and Activity in the last decades have received a total of 16.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Mind Culture and Activity usually cover Education (241 papers), Human Factors and Ergonomics (215 papers) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (178 papers) specifically the topics of Innovative Education and Learning Practices (215 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (76 papers) and Educational and Psychological Assessments (73 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Mind Culture and Activity are Barbara Rogoff, Jean Lave, Jay L. Lemke, Bruno Latour, Mariane Hedegaard, Yrjö Engeström, Wolff‐Michael Roth, Kris D. Gutiérrez, Reijo Miettinen and Stephen Billett.

In The Last Decade

Mind Culture and Activity

559 papers receiving 12.6k citations

Fields of papers published in Mind Culture and Activity

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Mind Culture and Activity. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Mind Culture and Activity.

Countries where authors publish in Mind Culture and Activity

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Mind Culture and Activity. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Mind Culture and Activity with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mind Culture and Activity more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026