Ming Studies

326 papers and 815 indexed citations
i
.

About

The 326 papers published in Ming Studies in the last decades have received a total of 815 indexed citations. Papers published in Ming Studies usually cover Sociology and Political Science (258 papers), Cultural Studies (111 papers) and Anthropology (37 papers) specifically the topics of Chinese history and philosophy (250 papers), Japanese History and Culture (108 papers) and Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (24 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Ming Studies are John W. Dardess, Susan Naquin, L. Carrington Goodrich, John Κ. Fairbank, Angela Zito, Romeyn Taylor, Willard J. Peterson, Edward L. Dreyer, Kenneth M. Swope and Judith T. Zeitlin.

In The Last Decade

Ming Studies

171 papers receiving 486 citations

Fields of papers published in Ming Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Ming Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Ming Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Ming Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Ming Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Ming Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026