Psychoanalytic Perspectives

316 papers and 698 indexed citations
i
.

About

The 316 papers published in Psychoanalytic Perspectives in the last decades have received a total of 698 indexed citations. Papers published in Psychoanalytic Perspectives usually cover Clinical Psychology (220 papers), General Psychology (48 papers) and Social Psychology (45 papers) specifically the topics of Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (203 papers), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (60 papers) and Transactional Analysis in Psychotherapy (57 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Psychoanalytic Perspectives are Kenneth A. Frank, Jessica Benjamin, Sheryl Brahnam, Lewis Aron, Mary Watkins, Thomas H. Ogden, Leora Trub, Chana Ullman, Neil Altman and Paul L. Wachtel.

In The Last Decade

Psychoanalytic Perspectives

109 papers receiving 346 citations

Fields of papers published in Psychoanalytic Perspectives

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Psychoanalytic Perspectives. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Psychoanalytic Perspectives.

Countries where authors publish in Psychoanalytic Perspectives

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Psychoanalytic Perspectives. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Psychoanalytic Perspectives with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Psychoanalytic Perspectives more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026