Public Archaeology

384 papers and 2.8k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 384 papers published in Public Archaeology in the last decades have received a total of 2.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Public Archaeology usually cover Archeology (208 papers), Anthropology (132 papers) and Space and Planetary Science (119 papers) specifically the topics of Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation (174 papers), Archaeological Research and Protection (119 papers) and Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies (69 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Public Archaeology are Yannis Hamilakis, Cornelius Holtorf, Dallen J. Timothy, Alfredo González‐Ruibal, Gabriel Moshenska, Francis McManamon, Neil Faulkner, Tim Schadla‐Hall, K. Anne Pyburn and Pedro Paulo A. Funari.

In The Last Decade

Public Archaeology

304 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Fields of papers published in Public Archaeology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Public Archaeology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Public Archaeology.

Countries where authors publish in Public Archaeology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Public Archaeology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Public Archaeology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Public Archaeology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026