Reading Psychology

968 papers and 12.7k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 968 papers published in Reading Psychology in the last decades have received a total of 12.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Reading Psychology usually cover Developmental and Educational Psychology (751 papers), Education (525 papers) and Statistics and Probability (137 papers) specifically the topics of Reading and Literacy Development (627 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (199 papers) and Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (137 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Reading Psychology are R. Malatesha Joshi, Joanne F. Carlisle, Andrew Biemiller, Roman Taraban, Laura M. Justice, Linda Baker, Timothy V. Rasinski, Cynthia B. Leung, Oddny Judith Solheim and Danielle S. McNamara.

In The Last Decade

Reading Psychology

851 papers receiving 10.7k citations

Fields of papers published in Reading Psychology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Reading Psychology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Reading Psychology.

Countries where authors publish in Reading Psychology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Reading Psychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Reading Psychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reading Psychology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026