Research Evaluation

983 papers and 18.5k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 983 papers published in Research Evaluation in the last decades have received a total of 18.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Research Evaluation usually cover Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (340 papers), Economics and Econometrics (226 papers) and Management Science and Operations Research (180 papers) specifically the topics of scientometrics and bibliometrics research (330 papers), Innovation Policy and R&D (157 papers) and Evaluation and Performance Assessment (133 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Research Evaluation are Dag W. Aksnes, Grit Laudel, Ben R. Martin, Thed N. van Leeuwen, Robert Tijssen, Liv Langfeldt, Erik Arnold, Lutz Bornmann, Jack Spaapen and Björn Hammarfelt.

In The Last Decade

Research Evaluation

517 papers receiving 10.4k citations

Fields of papers published in Research Evaluation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Research Evaluation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Research Evaluation.

Countries where authors publish in Research Evaluation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Research Evaluation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Research Evaluation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Research Evaluation more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026