Studies in the novel

601 papers and 1.4k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 601 papers published in Studies in the novel in the last decades have received a total of 1.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Studies in the novel usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (405 papers), Sociology and Political Science (122 papers) and History (93 papers) specifically the topics of Contemporary Literature and Criticism (102 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (66 papers) and American and British Literature Analysis (59 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Studies in the novel are Stef Craps, Michael Rothberg, Gert Buelens, Lydia R. Cooper, Tilottama Rajan, Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick, Robert Eaglestone, Paul A. Cantor, Pieter Vermeulen and Adeline Johns‐Putra.

In The Last Decade

Studies in the novel

275 papers receiving 728 citations

Fields of papers published in Studies in the novel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Studies in the novel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Studies in the novel.

Countries where authors publish in Studies in the novel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Studies in the novel. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Studies in the novel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Studies in the novel more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026