Systematic Reviews

2.9k papers and 86.8k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 2.9k papers published in Systematic Reviews in the last decades have received a total of 86.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Systematic Reviews usually cover General Health Professions (666 papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (538 papers) and Epidemiology (389 papers) specifically the topics of Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (337 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (205 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (187 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Systematic Reviews are Zbys Fedorowicz, Ahmed K. Elmagarmid, Hossam M. Hammady, Mourad Ouzzani, David Moher, Lesley Stewart, Mark Petticrew, Mike Clarke, Larissa Shamseer and Davina Ghersi.

In The Last Decade

Systematic Reviews

2.7k papers receiving 82.4k citations

Fields of papers published in Systematic Reviews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Systematic Reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Systematic Reviews.

Countries where authors publish in Systematic Reviews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Systematic Reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Systematic Reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Systematic Reviews more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026