Technology and Disability

785 papers and 7.4k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 785 papers published in Technology and Disability in the last decades have received a total of 7.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Technology and Disability usually cover Occupational Therapy (286 papers), Cognitive Neuroscience (117 papers) and Psychiatry and Mental health (102 papers) specifically the topics of Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (283 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (86 papers) and Digital Accessibility for Disabilities (75 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Technology and Disability are Louise Demers, Luc de Witte, Rhoda Weiss‐Lambrou, Bernadette Ska, Marion Hersh, Pier Luigi Emiliani, Jeffrey W. Jutai, Marcia J. Scherer, Hy Day and Denise Reid.

In The Last Decade

Technology and Disability

700 papers receiving 6.6k citations

Fields of papers published in Technology and Disability

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Technology and Disability. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Technology and Disability.

Countries where authors publish in Technology and Disability

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Technology and Disability. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Technology and Disability with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Technology and Disability more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026