The American Archivist

1.5k papers and 6.8k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 1.5k papers published in The American Archivist in the last decades have received a total of 6.8k indexed citations. Papers published in The American Archivist usually cover Conservation (873 papers), Information Systems (222 papers) and Space and Planetary Science (205 papers) specifically the topics of Digital and Traditional Archives Management (857 papers), Archaeological Research and Protection (205 papers) and Library Science and Information Systems (126 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The American Archivist are Warren Reid, Elizabeth Yakel, Randall C. Jimerson, Helen R. Tibbo, Wendy Duff, Kimberly Christen, Geoffrey Yeo, Dennis Meißner, Tom Nesmith and James O’Toole.

In The Last Decade

The American Archivist

844 papers receiving 4.0k citations

Fields of papers published in The American Archivist

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The American Archivist. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The American Archivist.

Countries where authors publish in The American Archivist

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The American Archivist. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The American Archivist with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The American Archivist more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026