The Ecumenical Review

1.1k papers and 1.8k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 1.1k papers published in The Ecumenical Review in the last decades have received a total of 1.8k indexed citations. Papers published in The Ecumenical Review usually cover Sociology and Political Science (686 papers), Religious studies (616 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (67 papers) specifically the topics of Christian Theology and Mission (515 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (514 papers) and Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies (243 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Ecumenical Review are Julius K. Nyerere, John S. Pobee, J.M. Vorster, Tinyiko Maluleke, Isabel Apawo Phiri, Maake J. Masango, Mercy Amba Oduyoye, Ernst M. Conradie, Lesslie Newbigin and Jürgen Moltmann.

In The Last Decade

The Ecumenical Review

427 papers receiving 993 citations

Fields of papers published in The Ecumenical Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Ecumenical Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Ecumenical Review.

Countries where authors publish in The Ecumenical Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Ecumenical Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Ecumenical Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Ecumenical Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026