The New Educator

379 papers and 3.1k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 379 papers published in The New Educator in the last decades have received a total of 3.1k indexed citations. Papers published in The New Educator usually cover Education (324 papers), Sociology and Political Science (89 papers) and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (27 papers) specifically the topics of Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (225 papers), Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion (99 papers) and Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (51 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The New Educator are Marilyn Cochran‐Smith, Michael Strong, Joyce L. Epstein, Karen Hammerness, Linda Darling‐Hammond, David M. Carroll, Wendy Gardiner, Martin Haberman, Eleanor Duckworth and Barbara Larrivee.

In The Last Decade

The New Educator

313 papers receiving 2.9k citations

Fields of papers published in The New Educator

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The New Educator. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The New Educator.

Countries where authors publish in The New Educator

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The New Educator. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The New Educator with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The New Educator more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026