Vanderbilt law review

1.2k papers and 5.0k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Vanderbilt law review in the last decades have received a total of 5.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Vanderbilt law review usually cover Political Science and International Relations (481 papers), Law (388 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (324 papers) specifically the topics of Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (320 papers), Legal and Constitutional Studies (162 papers) and Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (133 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Vanderbilt law review are Randall S. Thomas, Jerome H. Reichman, J. B. Ruhl, Lynn M. LoPucki, Donald C. Langevoort, Paul M. Schwartz, Stuart S. Nagel, Robert B. Thompson, Stephen M. Bainbridge and Richard Delgado.

In The Last Decade

Vanderbilt law review

762 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Fields of papers published in Vanderbilt law review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Vanderbilt law review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Vanderbilt law review.

Countries where authors publish in Vanderbilt law review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Vanderbilt law review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Vanderbilt law review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vanderbilt law review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026