Ophthalmology

515.5k papers and 10.0M indexed citations

About

515.5k papers covering Ophthalmology have received a total of 10.0M indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Glaucoma and retinal disorders, Retinal Diseases and Treatments and Intraocular Surgery and Lenses and also cover the fields of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Epidemiology and Molecular Biology. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Molecular Biology and Epidemiology. Some of the most active scholars covering Ophthalmology are Ronald Klein, David M. Nathan, Harry A. Quigley, Tien Yin Wong, Jost B. Jonas, Sohan Singh Hayreh, Robert N. Weinreb, Richard F. Spaide, Carol L. Shields and Jerry A. Shields.

In The Last Decade

Ophthalmology

84.4k papers receiving 660.0k citations

Fields of papers citing papers about Ophthalmology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Ophthalmology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Ophthalmology.

Countries where authors publish papers about Ophthalmology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Ophthalmology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Ophthalmology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ophthalmology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026