Virginia Caliendo
About
In The Last Decade
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Virginia Caliendo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Virginia Caliendo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Virginia Caliendo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Virginia Caliendo. Virginia Caliendo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Virginia Caliendo
29 papers receiving 391 citations
Fields of papers citing papers by Virginia Caliendo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Virginia Caliendo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Virginia Caliendo. The network helps show where Virginia Caliendo may publish in the future.
Countries citing papers authored by Virginia Caliendo
This map shows the geographic impact of Virginia Caliendo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Virginia Caliendo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Virginia Caliendo more than expected).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.