African Security Review

984 papers and 4.6k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 984 papers published in African Security Review in the last decades have received a total of 4.6k indexed citations. Papers published in African Security Review usually cover Sociology and Political Science (485 papers), Political Science and International Relations (455 papers) and Development (106 papers) specifically the topics of Global Peace and Security Dynamics (313 papers), Peacebuilding and International Security (176 papers) and International Development and Aid (106 papers). The most active scholars publishing in African Security Review are Freedom C. Onuoha, Jenny Clover, Jakkie Cilliers, Martin Schönteich, Richard Cornwell, Mark Malan, Lindy Heinecken, Tim Murithi, Jonathan Powell and Maxi Schoeman.

In The Last Decade

African Security Review

661 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Fields of papers published in African Security Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in African Security Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in African Security Review.

Countries where authors publish in African Security Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in African Security Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in African Security Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites African Security Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026